May
3, 2002
IBO
Sizes Up Ideas To Balance Budget
Catalyst for Debate
By Deidre McFadyen
The prevailing
wisdom about the city's $5 billion budget gap is that it stems from
the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 coupled with a national economy
that dipped into recession earlier last year.
But officials
from the Independent Budget Office, a city-funded nonpartisan fiscal
watchdog, maintain that the problems go deeper.
'Underlying
Imbalance'
In its introduction
to a new report analyzing 15 proposals to cut city costs and 18
ways to raise revenues, the agency says, "A significant portion
of the gap stems from an underlying structural imbalance in the
city's finances, and will not simply go away when the economy picks
up."
While not endorsing
any of the proposals, IBO officials said they presented the probable
fiscal impact of each idea along with the arguments for and against
with an eye to enriching the debate.
"How are we
suddenly in this hole?" asked IBO spokesman Doug Turetsky. "The
surpluses have masked the basic fact that our expenses have been
rising faster than our real sustainable revenues."
Mr. Turetsky
noted that the previous executive budget, signed in June by Mayor
Giuliani and Council Speaker Peter F. Vallone, projected a surplus
of $3.2 billion in that fiscal year and, in the same breath, a shortfall
of $2.6 billion in the following one.
A number of
the savings options in the report would run up against heavy resistance
from the city's labor unions, which argue that they have sacrificed
enough.
The IBO estimated
that the city could save $197 million in 2003 if it withheld the
equivalent of one week's pay per year from all city workers. Employees
would receive the deferred pay when they quit or retired. Proponents,
it noted, view a pay lag as a more palatable option than layoffs.
Another alternative
would be to reduce the workweek of municipal employees by two hours
to 33 hours a week. If Teachers, uniformed service workers and child
welfare workers were exempted, the reduction would trim $146 million
from payroll costs this coming fiscal year, the agency said.
The IBO calculated
that the city could save $160 million next year if it required employees
and retirees to contribute 10 percent towards their health insurance
premiums. It noted that New York State employees already pay 10
percent towards the cost of individual coverage and 25 percent of
the additional costs of family coverage.
Eye
Teacher, Cop Savings
The IBO report
also looked at savings that could be squeezed from particular agencies.
The elimination of Teacher sabbaticals would yield $74 million annually.
A move to one-person police patrol cars in low-crime areas could
save up to $196 million, once fully implemented, the agency said.
But an arbitration panel recently rejected a city proposal to limit
sabbaticals as unwise at a time when Teachers are underpaid and
in short supply. Patrolmen's Benevolent Association President Patrick
J. Lynch would vigorously oppose one-officer patrols on safety grounds.
The IBO also
analyzed a proposal to reduce Fire Department staff by 1,600 through
attrition without closing any firehouses. The reduction, it said,
could be achieved by modifying the constant staffing provisions
in the existing contract to permit the closing of certain firehouses
late at night, when emergencies are least common. The change would
net the city $65 million once fully enacted, the IBO said.
One savings
option that the union representing transit workers would embrace
calls for elimination the subsidy to private bus companies that
provide local service in Queens and Brooklyn and express service
between the outer boroughs and Manhattan. If New York City Transit
picked up those services, the agency said, the city could save $100
million annually.
On the revenue
enhancement side, the IBO analyzed an array of possible tax increases,
including restoring the commuter tax, increasing the base personal
income tax rate by 1 percent for high-income filers, and extending
the mortgage recording tax to co-ops. A 5-percent increase in the
property tax - the only tax that the city can raise without Albany's
approval - would yield an additional $487 million in revenue next
year, the agency said.
The report also
highlighted some hidden subsidies to corporations and other wealthy
stakeholders. The city could save $9.6 million by eliminating the
real property tax exemption that it granted to Madison Square Garden
in 1982 to ensure the viability of the Knicks and Rangers in New
York City.
The IBO also
examined the possibility of chipping away at the property tax exemption
enjoyed by private colleges and universities. It said the city could
save $41 million if these institutions were required to pay 25 percent
of what they would owe if property taxes were levied against them.

|