|
January 12, 2007
Say PBA Could Have Arbitrator Forced Upon
It
Failure to Participate In Choice Leaves City Making Call
By REUVEN BLAU
The Bloomberg administration's selection to chair the arbitration
panel handling the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association contract
could be automatically chosen if the union continues to question
the process, sources said last week. .
 |
|
| PATRICK J. LYNCH: Questions PERB's fairness. |
|
The two sides had been due to meet Dec. 27 to choose the chairperson
from among a list of nine names presented by the Public Employment
Relations Board, but the PBA canceled after objecting to two of
the arbitrators, who a decade ago froze cops' pay for two years,
conforming to a pattern set by other uniformed unions.
City: PBA Defaulted
"The rules and regulations of PERB say that in effect they've
defaulted," asserted Labor Commissioner James F. Hanley. "Everyone
on the list is deemed approved."
The union contended that it was merely questioning the process
used to select a chairman. "Discussion regarding the appointment
of an arbitrator is premature," PBA President Patrick J. Lynch
said in a statement, "while the PBA awaits a response to a
motion challenging both the lack of PERB board participation in
the formulation of the arbitrators list and the inclusion of certain
names in violation of the PERB selection criteria."
The PBA has argued that PERB officials promised the union that
the list of arbitrators would not include any mediators who were
involved in prior PBA decisions.
"Clearly, the inclusion of candidates who have ruled against
the PBA in the past and the exclusion of those who have ruled favorably
on PBA arbitrations demonstrates a lack of fairness," Mr.
Lynch stated.
The two arbitrators at issue, however, were part of a panel operating
under the jurisdiction of the city Board of Collective Bargaining,
not PERB. Following their 1997 award, the PBA succeeded in getting
legislation approved that permitted it to take contract disputes
to the state panel.
A Changed Stance
Mr. Hanley has noted that the two arbitrators, Arnold Zack and
Stanley Aegis, were on the lists of choices PERB presented to the
two sides for the PBA arbitrations that were decided in 2002 and
2005. In neither case, he pointed out, did the union reject the
lists based on their inclusion. He said he believed the union did
so this time as a delaying tactic.
City negotiators have contended that Mr. Lynch would prefer that
the contract not be decided until after his election next spring.
A contract reached 15 months ago with the Uniformed Firefighters'
Association that overlaps the two-year period at issue in the PBA
negotiating impasse provides raises of 3 and 3.15 percent.
But Mr. Lynch and Sergeants' Benevolent Association President
Ed Mullins have scoffed at the last two years of that deal, contending
that it doesn't keep up with inflation.
The unions representing Detectives and Lieutenants, however, have
both agreed to extended four-year contracts, noting that there
has been a 100-year-plus salary parity between cops and Firefighters.
An arbitration panel, they have said, will likely insist on maintaining
that tradition.
Seeking Political Cover?
One labor insider suggested that Mr. Lynch might be backing out
of the arbitration process to distance himself from an award which
will likely fall short of what he has promised his members.
"Obviously something else is going on here right now," said
another labor source. "I've never seen anything like this
happen."
The insider noted that the PBA previously claimed that the Board
of Collective Bargaining is biased and now appears to be questioning
the impartiality of PERB. "I don't know, maybe they'll wind
up in the Hague," he said.

|