|
October 12, 2007
Unions Suing Over Breathalyzer Policy
Cops in Shooting Tested
By REUVEN BLAU
The NYPD required Breathalyzer tests from three Detectives, two
of whom were grazed by bullets during a gunfight in a Bronx alley
on Oct. 3, marking the first time that law-enforcement officers
involved in a shootout in any U.S. jurisdiction have been routinely
subjected to that alcohol screening.
 |
| PATRICK J. LYNCH: Tests unwarranted. |
|
As this newspaper went to press Oct. 5, the police unions prepared
to go to Federal court to have the policy nullified.
A Rights Violation?
The unions contend that subjecting their members to such screenings
violates their constitutional rights. Their attorneys are also
scheduled to file an improper practice complaint with the Board
of Collective Bargaining, contending that the new policy must first
be negotiated.
The NYPD's Interim Order issued Sept. 30 states that all officers
involved in shootings that hit another person must be tested, no
matter what the circumstances were that caused the incident.
"In an effort to ensure the highest levels of integrity at
the scene of firearms discharges, all uniformed members of the
service involved in firearms discharges, which result in injury
to or death of a person, will be subject to Department-administered
alcohol testing," the directive states.
PBA: It's Excessive
Patrolmen's Benevolent Association President Patrick J. Lynch
last week blasted the policy, calling it "unnecessary" and "excessive." He
noted that the Detectives - Thomas Murphy, William Gonzalez and
Daniel Rivera - successfully apprehended the suspect, Jermaine
Taylor, who was wanted for shooting and wounding two people earlier
this year at a bodega in The Bronx.
The 5:30 a.m. shooting occurred in the Tremont section of the
borough after Mr. Taylor shot at least six times at the Detectives
as they tried to arrest him, according to the police. Mr. Taylor
jumped two stories from a back window in a second-floor apartment
at 2422 Webster Avenue.
Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly told reporters that the suspect
then opened fire on the officers with a 9-millimeter semiautomatic
pistol.
Did It By the Book
"This is a perfect example of members of the service returning
fire when fired upon, which policy clearly allows, and yet, they
are being treated as if their actions were reckless," Mr.
Lynch said in a statement.
Detective Gonzalez suffered a graze wound to the right shin and
his partner, Detective Rivera, was grazed on the forehead. Both
officers were in stable condition when they were admitted to St.
Barnabas Hospital for treatment. (Mr. Taylor sustained a fractured
right pelvis after his jump from the apartment.)
"They should be receiving praise and commendations, not alcohol-testing," Mr.
Lynch asserted.
The Breathalyzer screening policy for all officers after they
fire their guns in cases that involve injury or death is being
carefully watched by other law-enforcement groups throughout the
country, which are worried that the NYPD's proposal could set a
national precedent.
Response to Club Killing
In June, Commissioner Kelly announced 19 recommendations of a
special panel that he appointed to examine policies and procedures
governing undercover officers after the Nov. 25, 2006 police shooting
outside the Jamaica, Queens strip club Kalua that left Mr. Bell
dead and two friends wounded.
Presently, the department allows undercover officers to have two
drinks while on duty to help them keep their identities secret.
But critics of the department questioned why Det. Gescard Isnora,
who followed Mr. Bell and his friends from inside the club and
was the first to fire at the men, wasn't tested for alcohol after
the shooting.
Detectives Endowment Association President Michael J. Palladino
maintains that alcohol didn't factor into the fatal shooting, noting
that a supervisor at the scene deemed Officer Isnora fit for duty.
Officer Isnora said he drank two beers inside the club, according
to the NYPD's initial report of the incident.
The unions have also questioned the details of the NYPD's proposal.
Currently, there is no legal standard for impairment other than
for driving a vehicle, they have pointed out.
"The department's view is that the Police Commissioner has
the prerogative under the City Charter and the Administrative Code
in matters pertaining to discipline," Paul J. Browne, the
NYPD's chief spokesman, said shortly after the plan was announced.

|