| March 26, 2002 |
 |
Perjury
Charges
Schwarz indicted in Louima case
By
Patricia Hurtado
STAFF WRITER; Staff writer Bobby Cuza contributed to this story.
A
federal grand jury in Brooklyn indicted Charles Schwarz yesterday
on perjury charges for allegedly lying when he testified that
he played no role in the torture of Abner Louima.
The
indictment signals that federal prosecutors are not giving up
on their case against Schwarz, whose two convictions in the Aug.
9, 1997, attack on Louima were thrown out on appeal.
Schwarz,
who was freed on $1 million bail earlier this month, will face
two counts of perjury, prosecutors said. He declined to comment
on the new charges yesterday.
Brooklyn
U.S. Attorney Alan Vinegrad, who prosecuted Schwarz in the earlier
cases, said earlier this month that he was prepared to retry Schwarz,
and U.S. District Court Judge Reena Raggi has set a June 24 trial
date.
Schwarz
will be arraigned on the new charges on April 3, said William
Muller, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office. Each of the
perjury charges carries a maximum term of up to 5 years imprisonment
upon conviction.
In
a statement released yesterday, Vinegrad continued the government's
assertion that the so-called "Blue Wall of Silence"
kept officers from telling the truth about the attack, one of
the worst incidents of police brutality in city history.
"Many
acts of obstruction and lying have permeated this case from the
beginning," Vinegrad said yesterday. "This defendant,
having taken an oath that he would testify truthfully, took the
witness stand at a federal criminal trial and repeatedly lied
about the circumstances surrounding the sexual assault of Abner
Louima."
Vinegrad
has said no decision has been made on whether he would appeal
the appeals court decision that threw out Schwarz's convictions
on violating Louima's civil rights and conspiring to obstruct
justice. The prosecutor has until April 15 to appeal.
It
was unclear yesterday whether these latest charges would be added
to that case or be handled in a separate trial.
Schwarz's
lawyer, Ronald Fischetti, did not return calls for comment. Schwarz,
reached at his mother's Staten Island home, declined to comment
last night.
In
yesterday's indictment, Schwarz, 36, was charged with twice lying
to a jury when he took the stand in his own defense on Feb. 23,
2000. Schwarz was charged at that trial with conspiring with fellow
officers, Thomas Bruder and Thomas Wiese, to lie to investigators
in an effort to cover up Schwarz's role in the bathroom attack.
Schwarz was accused of allegedly holding Louima while Justin Volpe
sodomized the Haitian immigrant with a broken broom handle.
At
the second trial, Fischetti argued that Schwarz played no role
in the attack and therefore could not be guilty of conspiracy.
Yesterday's
indictment stemmed from Schwarz's answers to Fischetti's questions,
specifically that he did not escort Louima to the bathroom in
the 70th Precinct station house and that he was not present during
the attack.
It
is unclear how prosecutors intend to prove the latest charges,
but a review of the evidence shows that at least four witnesses
contradicted Schwarz and testified that they saw Louima in his
custody inside the precinct.
While
Louima was never able to identify Schwarz as the officer who restrained
him, two officers, Eric Turetzky and Mark Schofield, testified
that they saw Schwarz lead a handcuffed Louima toward the rear
of the precinct shortly before the attack. Sgt. Jeffrey Fallon
also testified that Schwarz had control of Louima.
Volpe,
who is serving a 30-year sentence after having pleaded guilty
to torturing Louima, testified at Schwarz's second trial that
Schwarz was not in the bathroom.
The
jury rejected the version of events offered by Schwarz and Volpe.
The three-judge panel that overturned Schwarz's conviction also
expressed doubts about his story, saying there was evidence Schwarz,
Bruder and Wiese lied to investigators.
Louima's
lawyer, Sanford Rubenstein, said yesterday that his client was
prepared to testify against Schwarz.
"This
is an indictment for lying at a trial about crucial facts, one,
who escorted Abner to the bathroom and who was with Volpe at the
time of the attack," Rubenstein said.
"These
charges go to the essence of where Schwarz said he was and what
he did - whether he was telling the truth at that second trial.
A jury heard that account and still convicted him."
Staff
writer Bobby Cuza contributed to this story.
Feds:
How He Lied
The
testimony cited by federal prosecutors in charging Charles Schwarz
with perjury at the 2000 trial at which he and fellow officers
Thomas Bruder and Thomas Wiese were accused of conspiring to obsturct
justice in the investigation of the police torture of Abner Louima.
Ron
Fischetti, Schwarz lawyer: