Delayed action prolonged the pain for 9/11 responders
By Sheryl McCarthy
In
November 2001, a small group of doctors from Mount Sinai Medical
Center and the city's fire department, along with others who'd been
seeing Ground Zero responders since right after the disaster, assembled
a set of medical guidelines for treating the responders, which was
posted on Mount Sinai's Web site.
The "protocols" were based on the kinds of illnesses
these doctors were observing in the responders and were meant to
help all doctors in the city properly diagnose and treat patients
who'd been exposed to the toxic smoke and dust at Ground Zero.
In December of that year, the doctors' group urged New York City
health officials to issue citywide guidelines, according to Dr.
Robin Herbert, co-director of Mount Sinai's World Trade Center Health
Monitoring Program. But the officials declined, saying there was
no clear consensus that the respiratory ailments were related to
exposure at the site.
Almost five years later, with hundreds of former Ground Zero workers
suffering from respiratory, gastrointestinal and mental ailments
that doctors say resulted from their work there, city health officials
are finally preparing the protocols, which they expect to be published
this summer. But doctors who observed these medical problems right
from the start are upset that it's taken the city so long.
"It's tragic that it's taken public health officials of New
York almost five years," Herbert told me. "It's better
late than never, but it's pretty late." She said there's no
doubt that the lack of citywide guidelines has resulted in some
patients' not being treated properly.
Medical protocols help doctors who are presented with certain symptoms
to ask the right questions, such as whether a patient who suddenly
comes down with a persistent cough had any exposure to Ground Zero.
Mount Sinai doctors also say it's important that doctors examining
a Ground Zero-exposed patient check for conditions that are now
known to be associated with exposure.
Dr. Jacqueline Moline, co-director of the program, said many of
the responders who were treated right after 9/11 were diagnosed
with acute bronchitis and given antibiotics for bronchial infections.
Many of them didn't have infections, she said; they had lung inflammations,
for which the proper treatment would have been inhaled steroids
or anti-inflammatory medicine.
"This was a classic example [of misdiagnosis and improper
treatment] because people didn't know what they were seeing,"
Moline said, "which is what prompted us to put those guidelines
on our Web site."
The burning question is whether the city's slow-footedness in issuing
its own protocols has anything to do with official concerns about
potential liability the city might have growing out of the Ground
Zero-related health problems. The city's Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene sends bulletins by mail and on its Web site to more
than 60,000 doctors, providing protocols for a variety of diseases.
Coming from public officials, these bulletins influence how doctors
treat patients.
City health officials deny that concerns about potential lawsuits
have influenced their policy. Dr. Lorna Thorpe, deputy city health
commissioner for epidemiology, said that after Sept. 11 officials
were concerned about "getting it right."
Early on, they believed the main health impact from 9/11 would
be mental problems, and it wasn't clear that there was a link between
the respiratory problems doctors were seeing and Ground Zero exposure,
she said. Now that the connection has been established, the city
is moving forward.
With at least one class-action lawsuit pending against the city
on behalf of plaintiffs claiming illnesses and even deaths as a
result of Ground Zero exposure, the city has denied any deaths were
related to exposure there. Some say the reason the city is moving
on the protocols now is because John Howard, the federal official
in charge of 9/11-related health issues, has asked for them. But
the city can't waste any more time. How many people could have been
spared prolonged discomfort and worsening illness if they had been
available earlier?
Sheryl McCarthy can be reached at mccart731@aol.com.

|