
Win on 9/11 health
BY PAUL H.B. SHIN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
The City Health Department yesterday finally issued long-awaited
guidelines for front-line doctors on how to spot and treat illnesses
related to the World Trade Center disaster, barely two weeks shy
of the fifth anniversary of 9/11.
But critics overwhelmingly blasted the agency for taking so long
to publish recommendations that could have spared an untold number
of ailing New Yorkers from suffering unnecessarily.
"It's outrageous that it took them so long," said Rep.
Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan, Queens).
Maloney noted that congressional testimony from doctors who have
been treating patients exposed to toxins and dust from Ground Zero
revealed that 30% to 40% of them were being misdiagnosed or getting
the wrong treatment from their own physicians.
Micki Siegel De Hernandez, health and safety director of the Communications
Workers of America, echoed the anger of several labor leaders. "The
Health Department has been missing in action when it comes to information
about 9/11-related illness," said De Hernandez, whose union
represents telecom workers and nurses who worked in lower Manhattan.
"It shouldn't have taken five years to do this. The information
has been available for a long time," she said.
But Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden called such charges a "misrepresentation."
"Until the last year or two, there's been a scarcity of published
scientific data on the respiratory effects" of WTCrelated illnesses,
Frieden said.
However, researchers at Mount Sinai Medical Center's WTC treatment
program issued similar recommendations on respiratory illnesses
in 2002, just months after the attacks.
The Health Department has previously alerted doctors about heightened
risks for mental health problems such as depression and post-traumatic
stress.
Frieden said he wished the clinical guidelines could have been
issued sooner - but noted that getting experts and other advisers
to reach a consensus took time. "This is a process of revision
that began quite a while ago," he said.
Maloney said the recent series of hard-hitting Daily News editorials
on the issue may have hastened health officials.
"I would say the Daily News editorials spurred them into action,"
she said.
Some ill New Yorkers said the guidelines were too little, too late.
"I am very disappointed," said Jo Polett, 54, who lives
on Duane St. in lower Manhattan. "I had no visible dust in
my home, but I still got sick."
A lab test showed her apartment was contaminated with WTC dust
containing elevated levels of lead and antimony.
Polett was eventually diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction
Syndrome (RADS) and still suffers from the pulmonary disorder.
Critics also expressed concern that the guidelines were too cautious
- only considering acute exposure to toxins in the "days and
months" after the disaster, and mentioning only in passing
diseases that may take years to develop, such as cancer.
"I am concerned that the approach here is still too limiting,"
said Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan). "I am particularly
troubled at the inadequate attention given to the issues of contaminated
indoor spaces and chronic exposure populations."
Jonathan Bennett of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety
and Health agreed.
"There is nothing in guidelines to indicate that a person
could have World Trade Center exposure because they work in an office
building or live in an apartment in lower Manhattan," Bennett
said. "It's irresponsible of these guidelines to act as if
that class of people shouldn't be considered."
Advocates for ailing cops, firefighters, cleanup workers and downtown
residents said that the language was overly cautious to avoid exposing
the city to future lawsuits - a charge Frieden strongly denied.
The city Law Department was shown early drafts of the document,
but "all decisions on content are made solely by the Health
Department," he said.
"The concept that the city is somehow saying, 'No. Nobody
is sick,' is just wrong. We're saying clearly that there are health
effects," Frieden said.

|