Feeling Scorn
on the Beat and Pressure From Above
By KEVIN FLYNN
December
26, 2000
 |
| An advertisement for the police union suggests
one of the frustrations that have led to what some in the
department see as a morale crisis, salaries that start at
$31,305 a year. |
| |
The Blues
This is the second in a series of articles examining the challenges and turmoil
facing the New York Police Department. |
| |
Related Article
• Behind the Success Story,
a Vulnerable Police Force (Nov. 25, 2000) |
he
problem is apparent at retirement parties in catering halls and
the back rooms of bars, where New York City police officers toast
the good fortune of their departing colleagues. Or at Police
Headquarters, where officers openly proclaim their bitterness
toward the job in elevators crowded with bosses. Or in decaying
station houses, where supervisors program desktop computers to
measure their time left to retirement, down to the minute.
In each
of these places, and across every rank, the darkened mood of
the New York Police Department has become obvious. The isolated
dissatisfactions that were once just muttered have now swelled
into a growl of discontent.
"Everybody
was disheartened," said Officer Peter Maher, recalling what
it was like in Manhattan's 34th Precinct before he quit the force
four months ago. He disregarded a pending promotion to sergeant
last August to take another police job, in Rockland County. "Every
day in the papers, people were bashing the cops. It became very
hard to do your job."
In the
annals of the Police Department, low morale is a problem that
predates the patrol car. But officers and senior supervisors
in commands across the city say they have seldom seen it worse.
In dozens of interviews over the last several months, they described
a dispirited force that has watched hundreds of colleagues flee
in recent months, retiring to take on second careers or quitting
in disgust long before they qualify for a full pension.
For patrol
officers, much of the disenchantment grows from a painful irony:
many of them believe the same aggressive crackdowns that drastically
cut crime and earned them accolades were stretched too far, that
the push to punish infractions of every variety undercut their
discretion and made them feel unpopular, even despised, in neighborhoods
they helped make safer.
For many
senior officers, the unceasing, sometimes exhausting pressure
to produce ever-impressive declines in crime has also given success
a sour taste. Some say they have left crime-fighting strategy
sessions furious about slights they received from supervisors
who dismissed yesterday's achievements as old news.
And pay
has become an enormous sore point. Officers who were once among
the highest paid police in the country now earn less than their
counterparts in Bridgeport, Conn., or Newark.
The most
pressing concern about the slumping morale is that it has exacerbated
the personnel crisis the 41,000-member department is facing,
even as it enjoys remarkable success in cutting crime. Retirements
are up 60 percent this year, and although there are a number
of reasons for the surge, low morale has clearly been a key one.
Similarly,
union officials say the department's difficulty in recruiting
this year, when it was unable to fill a Police Academy class
for the first time in memory, was affected by the fact that so
many officers are now reluctant to recommend the job.
Police
Commissioner Bernard B. Kerik, who has been in the job four months,
has said that improving morale is one of his primary goals. But
he says the problem is often overstated. Morale was much worse,
he said, during the Dinkins administration. Mr. Kerik, who was
an officer at the time, said many officers a decade ago felt
that they were not truly empowered to fight crime. He recalled
being scolded by superiors, for example, after arresting a man
who had dropped a bag of marijuana right in front of him. Only
narcotics officers, he was told, were supposed to make such arrests.
"You
want to talk about devastating morale," he said. "That's
devastating morale."
But while
he insists the problem of morale is a modest one, Mr. Kerik has
been concerned about it enough to have taken several steps to
deal with it, steps both ceremonial and concrete. He has held
informal dinners with officers and made impromptu visits to station
houses where he has tried to impress on officers that he remembers
the perils and annoyances of the job. He has made the renovation
of decrepit station houses a priority and is credited with relaxing
the bureaucracy that has held up many transfers.
"Morale
is on the rise," he said. "I think it is doing good.
I think it could do better."
Measuring
morale is a tricky business, in part because when police labor
leaders are in the midst of contract negotiations, as they are
now, they often strategically highlight discontent. Beyond that,
grousing about the job has long been a kind of practiced staple
of New York police culture. And there are events on the police
calendar, celebratory days when white-gloved officers about to
be promoted are showered with applause from family and friends,
when officers say the job still seems like a noble adventure.
But veteran
officers say the mood has been growing bleaker for several years,
beginning with a 1995 labor contract that included a two-year
wage freeze and continuing through the public scrutiny of police
practices that followed the torture of Abner Louima and the shooting
of Amadou Diallo.
However
imprecise, or even nostalgic, these impressions are, they are
bolstered by statistics that lend some weight to the view that
police morale has sunk.
If not
for Operation Condor, an overtime initiative that has paid officers
an extra $100 million this year to work a sixth day, arrests
would be down 15 percent this year compared to last. Several
commanders said they viewed the statistic as an indication that
some demoralized officers on the street have become less productive.
The number
of lieutenants taking the captain's test has dropped precipitously,
a development union officials cite as evidence that supervisors
are avoiding the pressures of senior command. In 1990, 80 percent
of the lieutenants took the test. Last year, only 54 percent
of the 1,635 lieutenants took the test.
But police
officials said they were unconvinced. The clearest measure of
police productivity, they said, is the crime rate, and that has
continued to drop — by 6 percent this year.
"The
people who want to be a cop, the good cops out there," said
Mr. Kerik,
"they could have contract issues, the negativity with the
community, but when the radio blares and somebody is in trouble,
or there is a fire, or there is something going on, those guys
are going."
The
Pressure
'Slapped Around' Over Crime Data
It is
an idea so successful that it has been exported to police departments
around the world: the Compstat meeting, at which commanders are
grilled about crime in their jurisdictions before a dais of bosses
in Police Headquarters.
To its
many admirers, Compstat, with its use of computers to map crime
patterns and rates, has been pivotal to the reduction in crime
since its introduction at the start of the Giuliani administration.
They say it gave commanders a chance to exchange ideas on strategy
and created a culture of accountability in which supervisors
who achieved the best numbers were rewarded.
But many
commanders say Compstat evolved into an often humiliating experience
that seemed more like hazing than brainstorming. Supervisors
say they have been screamed at, or picked apart about details
in crime patterns they could not possibly remember. Some have
lost their commands. And even those who have succeeded say they
get flustered because, as crime has slowed to a trickle, they
are unsure how they can possibly get it down further.
"Initially,
when it started, it worked well," one Bronx commander said
of Compstat.
"It woke everybody up. Now they are out of their minds. It's
ugly."
Sgt.
Michael McNally of the 44th Precinct in the Bronx quit the force
in September, in part because he said the demands had become
unreasonable. "With the bosses, there was such a pressure
to produce that it made the job almost inhumane," he said. "They
want you to treat the public with respect, which most cops did.
But respect didn't come from the top down."
Mr. Kerik
said he was trying to improve the relationship between bosses
and subordinates by emphasizing the need to treat officers with
professional respect.
But union
officials said some veteran officers are so put off by the pressure
of command now that they are doing what once would have been
virtually unthinkable, avoiding promotions.
A lieutenant
in the Transit Division said he avoided moving to the Patrol
Division, which is a higher-profile unit of the department, because
lieutenants there are more closely questioned at Compstat. "I
didn't want to have to get dragged down and get slapped around," he
said.
And in
the department's detective division, veteran investigators said
the risk of failing to meet unrealistic demands for reducing
crime ever further felt so great that many qualified detectives
no longer fought for the jobs of heading precinct squads. As
a result, squads are increasingly supervised by officers from
the Patrol Division, who have less investigative experience.
Police
officials deny any problems in attracting candidates for promotion.
They said fewer lieutenants were taking the captain's test because
of their overtime earnings, which are unavailable to captains.
Union officials disagreed.
"The
overtime for lieutenants has always existed," said John
Driscoll, president of the Captains Endowment Association, which
represents many supervisory officers. "So why didn't this
happen years ago? The answer is that back then captains were
not getting treated so terribly."
The
Derision
Hearing 'Diallo' Far Too Often
When
recruits talk about why they chose a police career, they often
say they did it to help people. And the officers who have reclaimed
many of the crime-ridden streets of New York say they feel sure
they have helped people immeasurably. But many also say they
are disliked on the very streets they helped reclaim.
Sometimes,
the resentment can seem raw and familiar.
"More
people come forward now and yell when you are arresting somebody,"
said a Bronx officer who spent several years in the 41st Precinct.
"They say the arrest was race generated, that `If that was
a white boy, would he be going to jail?' Or they say, `Don't torture
him. Don't do to him what you did to Diallo and Louima.' I'd say
once a week you hear one of their names."
When
officers describe why they feel unappreciated, the news media
is usually identified as a culprit. Reporters undermined public
support for the police, they say, by portraying isolated incidents
of brutality as the norm. Many officers also believe politicians
have used incidents of misconduct or misjudgment in sensational
ways to inflame the public's opinion of the police, particularly
among the city's minority residents.
But many
also blame a department that they say went overboard in its enforcement
efforts, worrying too much about minor offenses and summons totals
and too little about public sentiment in the neighborhoods they
patrol.
From
1991 through 1999, the number of felony arrests fell by 17 percent,
in large part because serious crimes dwindled. During the same
period, the number of misdemeanor arrests rose by 64 percent.
This year, marijuana-related arrests have increased by 39 percent
and Criminal Court summonses for offenses like public drinking
and loitering are up 16 percent.
Many
officers say they were forced to pursue quality-of-life offenses
with such vigor that it made their efforts seem petty or discriminatory.
One officer recalled how depressed a colleague was after returning
from an assignment in Jackson Heights, Queens, in which he was
directed to give out tickets to men drinking beer on their stoops
after work.
"These
guys were outside again because we made it safe," the officer
said.
"They're thrilled the cops are here, and now you're walking
up and giving them a summons."
And that
recollection, variations of which were echoed repeatedly in conversations
with officers over the last several months, captures one of the
greatest frustrations felt by officers. Officers say that to
feel estranged from and deeply mistrusted by the very people
they made safe denies them one of the job's greatest satisfactions.
Even
Louis Anemone, a former chief of department who was seen by many
officers as an unrelenting taskmaster, said he believed the core
mission of catching serious felons got lost at times in the pursuit
of productivity. He cited an initiative in Brooklyn in 1998 to
stop ride-by shootings by men on bicycles. Bicycle check points
were set up where, on the pretense of issuing safety summonses,
officers were able to seize illegal guns.
Soon,
however, the program was exported to other precincts where, Mr.
Anemone said, it evolved into largely a bicycle summons program,
and was tarred as a petty way to ticket people for riding bicycles
that lacked bells.
"Never,
ever, was this supposed to be about numbers," Mr. Anemone
said.
Mr. Kerik
acknowledged that many officers believed many New Yorkers, especially
blacks and Latinos, did not like them. He called it a huge misconception
he was trying to correct.
"I
have been in those communities," he said. "I have talked
to those community councils and sat with the civic boards and
community boards, and the first thing they ask for is more cops."
But Mr.
Kerik defended the wisdom of pushing for higher numbers, and
called quality-of-life enforcement effective. At the same time,
he said, the department needs to adjust when a crime pattern
ebbs and relocates. At some point, he said, the question arises: "Why
now are we hassling people with bikes without bells? It's time
to move on."
The
Paycheck
Danger and Ridicule for $31,305 a Year
Many
officers and commanders say the city could solve a giant chunk
of its morale problem by raising pay. The starting salary for
New York officers, $31,305, now lags behind that paid in many
cities, and pay is one of the largest obstacles to attracting
recruits. And the importance of using pay to stem the exodus
from the department can hardly be understated when a quarter
of the force will become eligible for retirement over the next
five years.
Many
officers speak with bitterness about their salaries, in part
because they say their standard of living fell even as their
workload and accomplishments rose. To illustrate, one lieutenant
recalled a night two years ago, soon after he had returned to
patrol duties in Queens from a desk job. A report came over the
radio, he said, announcing that intruders had just fled a home
they had invaded.
"In
the old days," the lieutenant said, "we used to go
out, take the report and broadcast the description." This
time, he said, all units were given detailed instructions and
they responded like a well-oiled machine to capture the suspects.
Several patrol cars responded immediately. Others rushed to prearranged
locations on the neighborhood's perimeter to begin searching
cars for possible suspects. The precinct then revised its patrol
pattern to put still more cars in areas the invaders were expected
to drive through.
"It
was like a modern police department," the lieutenant said. "It
was modern in everything but pay."
Mr. Kerik
has repeatedly said he supports a raise. But contract negotiations
are stalled, and the figure the mayor has mentioned as a possible
yearly raise, 2.5 percent, is about a tenth of what the Patrolmen's
Benevolent Association is demanding.
In recent
days, city officials have said labor unions will have to scale
back their expectations because the city is facing a budget deficit
in the coming fiscal year. It is not clear, however, that the
city's financial rationale means much to officers, for whom pay
has become an emotional issue. Officer Raymond Menell said he
quit the department last month after 21 years because he came
to view his take-home pay of about $660 a week as an insult.
He had suffered a heart attack 10 years ago, but decided against
filing for a disability pension and an easier life because, he
said: "I love the Police Department. I love being a cop."
But he
never got over the sting of the last police contract, in which
officers did not receive a raise in two of the pact's five years.
"We
did what we were told to do," he said, "and to give
us zeros, that was a slap in the face."  |