February 14, 2002
Bloomberg Seeks Cuts in Spending at Most Agencies
By MICHAEL COOPER
ayor
Michael R. Bloomberg yesterday proposed closing the city's $4.76
billion deficit by cutting almost all city agencies, including
the Police and Fire Departments and the schools, and by suspending
the city's program to recycle cans and bottles. In the first budget
plan of his mayoralty, he also proposed raising the cigarette tax
by $1.42 a pack and borrowing $1.5 billion to close the gap.
Mr. Bloomberg said the dire measures in his $41.4 billion budget
were needed to make up for the steep decline in tax revenues caused
by the combination of the national recession and the attack on
the World Trade Center. He promised that the city would still be
able to keep its streets safe and clean and to repair its schools.
"The budget that we're going to show you hurts everybody,"
Mr. Bloomberg said as he presented the plan at City Hall. "We
don't think it hurts anybody fatally. But it is a spread-your-pain,
no-sacred-cow kind of a solution to our problem."
His austere budget for the fiscal year beginning on July 1 ushered
in a new, rockier phase to his tenure, which has so far been marked
by a rather easy political honeymoon. Advocates denounced the cuts
to social programs. Smokers complained about the steeper cigarette
taxes.
But perhaps the fiscal tactic most likely to draw fire, and the
one Mr. Bloomberg seemed most defensive about yesterday, was his
decision to issue $1.5 billion in new debt to cover current operating
costs. Using deficit financing money that future taxpayers
will have to pay back, with interest to cover the city's
current operating costs is a practice harking back to the nightmarish
cycle of the fiscal crisis of the 1970's, when the city continued
to borrow to pay day- to-day bills and could not bring in cash
fast enough.
Mr. Bloomberg defended the tactic several times in his speech
yesterday, stressing that the events of Sept. 11 were unforeseen
and required
"extraordinary measures." He promised that his administration
would not borrow to pay for operating expenses in later years.
"I hope that the rating agencies understand and people who
are worried about our future," Mr. Bloomberg said as he tried
to reassure the agencies that assess the marketability of the city's
bonds and the soundness of its fiscal policies.
"We're not trying to mortgage our future," he said. "But
we are going to close a budget deficit with four different actions.
One is to reduce expenses. One is to raise revenues where possible.
One is to defer to the future things we'd like to do now. And the
fourth one is to spend some of the moneys we're going to get later
today."
The mayor's budget plan is just the beginning of a process that
goes on for months, and many of his suggested cutbacks will probably
be traded for others by the City Council, which must pass the budget.
Council officials made it clear that they were troubled by some
provisions in his proposal and said they would go through it line
by line.
Almost no one will be shielded from the budget knife under Mr.
Bloomberg's proposal. His plan calls for closing centers and eliminating
weekend meals for the elderly. It would eliminate 75 ambulance
shifts to reduce overtime costs. Legal services to help people
fight evictions would be cut. Libraries would be cut by $39 million.
And city money for the Board of Education would be cut by $354
million.
Armed with a laser pointer as part of his PowerPoint presentation,
the mayor, whose successes in the private sector made him a billionaire,
tried to deliver on his campaign theme that the city needed a businessman
to guide it through uncertain fiscal times.
When it comes down to it, there are not that many ways to close
a budget deficit: the city can cut costs, borrow money, get state
or federal aid or raise taxes. Mr. Bloomberg's proposal relies
most heavily on the first two options: it calls for $1.86 billion
in cuts and additional revenues to city agencies, and for borrowing
$1.5 billion through a bond sale.
Mr. Bloomberg reiterated his belief that raising taxes would hurt
the city in the long run by scaring away businesses and residents.
But his budget does call for raising a number of fees, including
the towing fee, to $175 from $150, and the fine for failing to
separate recyclable paper from the trash, to $50 from $25. And
it calls for raising the cigarette tax to $1.50 a pack from 8 cents.
A pack of cigarettes now costs about $5, with the tax.
That would generate $250 million in new revenue and, he said,
discourage smoking. "The numbers are clear: you raise cigarette
taxes, the kids smoke less," Mr. Bloomberg said.
His budget also relies heavily on $800 million in revenues that
the city can achieve only if the state and federal governments
take action. It also calls for scaling back capital construction
projects, like building new schools, by 20 percent
Agencies that have long been shielded from budget cuts were hit
this year.
Mr. Bloomberg's proposal calls for the first planned reduction
in the size of the Police Department in more than a decade. The
force is currently budgeted for 40,710 uniformed positions, but
there are fewer than 39,000 officers working because of a wave
of retirements and difficulty in recruiting new officers. Mr. Bloomberg's
plan would make the official number of budgeted positions 39,110.
The budget proposal would actually add 73 firefighter positions
to the Fire Department. But it would cut the Fire Department's
budget by $60 million over all.
To offset the loss of some of the police positions, Mr. Bloomberg's
budget calls for hiring 800 civilians to take desk jobs held by
police officers, freeing up the officers for patrol duties. But
the proposed reduction in the size of the force drew some criticism.
Patrick J. Lynch, the president of the Patrolmen's Benevolent
Association, the union representing police officers, said he thought
it was a
"huge danger" to talk about reducing the force.
Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said that he was confident
the department could continue to protect the public and cut crime,
but that the planned reduction of 1,600 positions was significant.
"When you reduce 1,600 officers, that's not symbolic,"
he said. "That is a significant cut."
Mr. Bloomberg said he would authorize Mr. Kelly to hire more officers
if crime started to rise. "We are committed to keeping this
city safe," he said. "And I will authorize the commissioner
to do whatever it takes if crime starts going up."
Although the city will spend more money next year, it will provide
fewer services. Mr. Bloomberg's proposed budget is $41.4 billion,
up from this year's $41.3 billion budget. Mr. Bloomberg said that
the extra money would pay debt service and pension costs.
The $354 million proposed cut to the schools represents a roughly
7 percent reduction in the amount of city aid to the Board of Education,
which gets most of its money from the state. Schools Chancellor
Harold O. Levy said that his goal would be to "absorb as much
of the pain as possible" in school administration and not
in the classroom.
Now the City Council will take up the budget, holding a series
of hearings on it. "We are committed to going over this budget
line by line to ensure that we maintain important services,"
Council Speaker Gifford Miller said.
Several council members said they were concerned by the cuts in
services for the elderly, social services and the libraries. Mr.
Bloomberg said he would consider restoring money if he was presented
with alternate cuts. Several council officials said they were hopeful
that they could negotiate a budget agreement with the mayor, but
some held open the possibility that they would try to pass their
own budget.
Some council members said that they were particularly dismayed
by the mayor's proposal to suspend recycling of cans and bottles.
The plan, which would save $56.6 million next year, requires their
approval.
Mr. Bloomberg said that he wanted to suspend the program because
it does not work: it is expensive, and 40 percent of the cans and
bottles collected are never recycled. So he called for eliminating
the program next year and devising a new one that he would like
to see paid with the 5-cent deposits currently collected on cans
and bottles.
Environmentalists called the plan a step backward. John J. Doherty,
the sanitation commissioner, acknowledged that there was some danger
that people would get out of the habit of separating their cans
and bottles from the trash, a practice that has been built up with
costly advertising campaigns. But he said they could get back into
the habit.
Over all, Mr. Bloomberg said, his challenge was to cut agencies
without drastically affecting services, and to tell New Yorkers
about the city's problems without scaring them. "So on one
hand, I want to paint you a realistic picture of how severe our
financial problems are," he said. "On the other hand,
I don't want you to walk away thinking that there is no hope."

|