February 23, 2002
Mayor Says City Can't Afford Higher Raises
for the Police
By AL BAKER
ayor
Michael R. Bloomberg said yesterday that the city would have a "tough
time" giving police officers raises larger than those proposed
by the previous administration, even if a state arbitration panel
were to rule that a larger-than-budgeted salary increase was warranted.
On his weekly radio show, Mayor Bloomberg laid out his rationale
on why the city, which faces a $4.76 billion budget deficit, would
be hard pressed to pay police officers more than the amount currently
planned: a roughly 10 percent salary increase over the next two
years.
Police officers received no raises in the first two years of their
last contract, which was for 63 months and expired on July 31,
2000. The mayor noted that the police "settled for no raises"
during times that were economically booming.
On point after point during his radio show, the mayor made note
of arguments that have been made in the past as to why officers
should receive large raises and pointedly deflated them. Referring
to the fact that Nassau County police officers are paid considerably
more than officers in New York City which has prompted calls
for raises in the city he noted that the county was "fundamentally
bankrupt."
"The city does not have any extra money, we all know that,"
said the mayor, who made his comments on WABC. "Right now,
the city economy is declining, not growing, and we're going to
have a tough time coming up with anything more if the arbitration
panel rules that."
The city is at impasse in negotiations with the 25,000-member
Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, said Robert W. Linn, the union's
chief negotiator. The city is scheduled to begin legally binding
arbitration hearings on March 18, before a state appointed three-member
panel that is headed by Dana E. Eischen, an arbitrator from Ithaca,
N.Y., Mr. Linn said.
The mayor's comments, his first substantive public comments on
the police salary issue since his budget address last week, seemed
to foreshadow what the city's argument would be in front of that
arbitration panel. A decision, which will serve as the new contract,
is expected by June, Mr. Linn said.
"By any standard, whether looking at nearby municipalities
or national cities, New York City police officers are woefully
underpaid,"
Mr. Linn said. "And we believe we will present a compelling
case that will persuade Chairman Eischen that the city must provide
a market adjustment to provide competitive salaries."
Asked how the city would manage fiscally if the arbitration panel
ruled that it must pay more to its police officers than what was
budgeted, Edward Skyler, the mayor's chief spokesman, reiterated
the mayor's comments. "The mayor will support our police officers
in any way he can," Mr. Skyler said. "But the fact is
that the city is facing a $5 billion budget deficit and the current
offer is all we can afford."
The current entry-level base salary for city police officers is
$31,305 a year, not including differentials for working at night
or holiday pay. In contrast to many other cities, the pay for New
York City officers does not jump substantially until after the
fifth year of service, when it increases to $49,023, Mr. Linn said.
Police union officials have long said that low pay is the prime
reason for a recent exodus of officers. In a statement, Patrick
J. Lynch, the union president, said: "Mayor Bloomberg must
realize that any offer that shortchanges New York City police officers
will not, in the long run, be a cost-effective policy. It will
only intensify the recruitment and retention crisis. You need a
well- paid, professional police force to continue the historic
crime reductions and quality-of-life improvements, and to be successful
in the domestic war against terrorism."
The mayor said the city should stay tuned. "Will they get
more out of Albany or less?" the mayor asked, referring to
the arbitration panel. "The city thinks less, the P.B.A. thinks
more. We'll find out how that plays itself out."

|