December 7, 2002
Judge Sticks by Dismissal of Officer-Shooting
Case
By LYDIA POLGREEN
State Supreme Court justice in Queens yesterday declined to reinstate
charges against a man accused of shooting a police officer, saying
his right to a speedy trial had been violated. The ruling drew angry
criticism from police union officials.
The justice, Laura Blackburne, found that the charge of attempted
murder against the man, William Hodges, 31, could not stand because
the prosecution had been too slow to put him on trial.
Prosecutors will immediately appeal the ruling, said Patrick Clark,
a spokesman for the Queens district attorney, Richard A. Brown.
Members of Mr. Hodges's family and supporters of Justice Blackburne
packed the courtroom and hailed the decision, but outside, on the
courthouse steps, police union officials demanded that the judge
resign immediately.
"It makes every police officer doubt why they do what they
do when the courts don't stand behind them," said Patrick Lynch,
president of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association.
The officer who was shot, David Gonzalez, has recovered and remains
on active duty, now as a detective; he said he was deeply disappointed
by the ruling.
"I wish I would have been able to tell my side of this story
to a jury," Detective Gonzalez said yesterday. "I wanted
a jury to determine his guilt or innocence. He tried to kill me.
Now he is walking the streets. I hope he doesn't try to kill anyone
else."
The decision was the latest, but probably not the last, installment
in a contentious case that has already spanned three years, seven
different judges, at least five prosecutors and three defense lawyers.
Mr. Hodges was arrested in 1999 after the shooting, which took
place in his Jamaica apartment building when Detective Gonzalez
was a rookie officer. The shooting happened during a scuffle; Officer
Gonzalez's gun went off and a bullet struck him in the leg.
After numerous delays in the complex case, in October, Justice
Blackburne threw out a 13-count indictment against Mr. Hodges and
ordered him released without bail pending a hearing from the prosecution
asking that the charges be reinstated.
At the time of that ruling, police union officials accused Justice
Blackburne of favoring Mr. Hodges because the judge belonged to
the same N.A.A.C.P. chapter as Mr. Hodges's mother, Sandra. Through
a spokesman, the judge denied knowing Mrs. Hodges.
Police union officials have assailed Justice Blackburne, calling
her biased against police officers and demanding that she step down
from the bench.
After the decision was handed down yesterday, David Bookstaver,
a spokesman for the State Office of Court Administration, issued
a statement that said Justice Blackburne's decision "was not
based on personal opinion or predilection but on the laws of the
State of New York."
Mr. Bookstaver continued, "To personally attack a judge for
doing her job is inappropriate, unfair and undermines our judicial
system."
In her ruling, Justice Blackburne said the prosecution was required
to bring Mr. Hodges to trial within six months. Prosecutors argued
that Mr. Hodges and his lawyers had caused much of the delay, but
Justice Blackburne in almost each instance attributed the delay
to the prosecution.
The orderly courtroom scene that unfolded yesterday as supporters
of the judge and Mr. Hodges packed the benches was in stark contrast
to the scene at the previous hearing, Nov. 8, when police officers
chanted "cop killer" and "disgrace" as Mr. Hodges
left the courtroom.
After the judge delivered her ruling, she took the unusual step
of having court officers escort Mr. Hodges from the courtroom and
requiring everyone else to stay until she had left the courtroom.
Mr. Bookstaver said that while this was unusual it was not unheard
of.
"This case is fraught with emotion," he said. "The
court officers have as part of their responsibility the job of not
even allowing a situation that may be unpleasant."

|