 |
February 23, 2006
For Immediate Release |
Contact: Albert O'Leary
212-298-9190
or Joseph Mancini
212-298-9150
|
Statement by PBA President Patrick J. Lynch
The PBA newsletter
reflected my views and that of the PBA Executive Board, and those
views were committed to paper to keep our members fully informed
about what we’ve accomplished over the last two contract rounds
and to respond to unprecedented and unwarranted public criticism
leveled first by the DEA and LBA of the PBA’s arbitration
awards.
If we had wanted to sabotage the DEA’s ratification process,
we would have gone public before the contract was submitted to –
and rejected by – the DEA membership. But our statements certainly
seem to have hit a nerve, judging from the ill-considered comments
to The Chief-Leader by the presidents of some of the other police
unions.
The PBA has demonstrated its ability to negotiate in the last
two rounds by gaining for its members hundreds of millions of dollars
in additional compensation over and above what the city’s
last best offers were – insulting offers, by the way, as all
uniform unions agreed – and about $5 million in extra health
and welfare benefits.
It is ironic, indeed, that these unions are disparaging an arbitration
process that has resulted in tens of millions of dollars in additional
compensation to their members in the last two rounds. As in the
past, their comments lead me to believe that these union leaders
are singing from the city’s sheet of music.
###
|